Adding classes doesn't tell us much more about this adv gp
Blogger Comments:
[1] To be clear, for Halliday (1994: 210), there is no submodification in this adverbial group:
So
As can be seen, the dependency relations all obtain between words.
[2] To be clear, Rose proposes internal bracketing, or nesting, where there is none, giving the analysis:
β(β(β(βα)α)α)α
which can be expanded as
ββββ ^ βββα ^ ββαβ ^ ββαα ^ α
Rose then compounds the error by misinterpreting the nesting as the triple embedding of adverbial groups within the adverbial group, without realising that they must be embedded on this analysis. And, on the belief that the adverbial groups are not embedded, incongruously proposes 2-unit complexes (duplexes) consisting of units of different ranks: group and word.
