Be careful when saying:you could take out the 'that means' and experientially the clause means the same thing, hence my suggestion that 'that means' is redundantJust because it does not serve an experiential function does not mean it it redundant. It serves a logical function, and removing it loses the logical connectivity of ideas.Shooshi says that "that means" is not conjunction but rather reference, and that is true if looked at in terms of grammar. But discoursally, "that means" is one discoursal strategy to link one clause to another as a consequence. For instance, would you take the following two clauses as saying the same thing:The northern hemisphere is tilting towards the sun,that means that the Southern hemisphere is tilting away.The northern hemisphere is tilting towards the sun.Consequently, the Southern hemisphere is tilting awayFor me, this is a case where a semantic relation between two processes can be mapped onto lexicogrammar in distinct ways.And getting back to your example, the fact that "consequently" can be dropped without affecting the experiential meaning of the second clause does not mean "consequently" is redundant, just that it serves a logical not experiential function.
Blogger Comments:
To be clear, the two clause complexes under discussion are:
When the Northern hemisphere is tilting towards the sun that means that it is summer in the Northern hemisphere.And because the northern hemisphere is tilting towards the sun that means that the Southern hemisphere is tilting away.
[1] Importantly, the inclusion of that means that is the student's step towards mastering grammatical metaphor. See Tilting Towards Grammatical Metaphor. Removing this wording makes the clause complexes more congruent:
[2] This is misleading, because it is untrue. The wording that means serves the experiential functions Token and Process: relational: identifying: intensive: sign. The logical relation between the clauses in each complex is marked by the conjunction of the dependent clause: when (temporal) and because (cause: reason).
[3] This is misleading, because it is untrue. The reference is made by that, not that means.
[4] This is misleading, because it is untrue. The two wordings are not saying the same thing. The first pair of clauses (not a complex) are related by cohesive reference (that) and do not express the meaning 'consequence', whereas the second pair of clauses are related by cohesive conjunction and do express the meaning 'consequence'.
Agnate wordings of the first pairing include:
- The northern hemisphere is tilting towards the sun; that indicates that the Southern hemisphere is tilting away.
- The northern hemisphere is tilting towards the sun; that suggests that the Southern hemisphere is tilting away.
- The northern hemisphere is tilting towards the sun; that implies that the Southern hemisphere is tilting away.
See Halliday & Matthiessen (2014: 269).
[5] This is misleading, because it is untrue. The conjunctive Adjunct consequently, which does not feature in the original example under discussion, functions textually, not logically, since it marks a relation of cohesive conjunction.
∞
See also:
The Promotion Of Anti-Intellectualism In The SFL Community
Mick O'Donnell Falsely Accusing The Sys-Func Moderator Of Misogyny.